docs: data updated

This commit is contained in:
Andy Lee
2025-09-15 19:50:02 -07:00
parent d7011bbea0
commit a0d6857faa
9 changed files with 749 additions and 133 deletions

View File

@@ -1,18 +1,19 @@
# Enron Emails Benchmark
A retrieval-only benchmark for evaluating LEANN search on the Enron email corpus. It mirrors the structure and CLI of the existing FinanceBench and LAION benches, using stage-based evaluation focused on Recall@3.
A comprehensive RAG benchmark for evaluating LEANN search and generation on the Enron email corpus. It mirrors the structure and CLI of the existing FinanceBench and LAION benches, using stage-based evaluation with Recall@3 and generation timing.
- Dataset: Enron email CSV (e.g., Kaggle wcukierski/enron-email-dataset) for passages
- Queries: corbt/enron_emails_sample_questions (filtered for realistic questions)
- Metric: Recall@3 vs FAISS Flat baseline
- Metrics: Recall@3 vs FAISS Flat baseline + Generation evaluation with Qwen3-8B
## Layout
benchmarks/enron_emails/
- setup_enron_emails.py: Prepare passages, build LEANN index, build FAISS baseline
- evaluate_enron_emails.py: Evaluate retrieval recall (Stage 2)
- evaluate_enron_emails.py: Evaluate retrieval recall (Stages 2-5) + generation with Qwen3-8B
- data/: Generated passages, queries, embeddings-related files
- baseline/: FAISS Flat baseline files
- llm_utils.py: LLM utilities for Qwen3-8B generation (in parent directory)
## Quickstart
@@ -41,23 +42,33 @@ Stage 3 uses binary search over complexity to find the minimal value achieving t
4) Index comparison (Stage 4)
python evaluate_enron_emails.py --index data/enron_index_hnsw.leann --stage 4 --max-queries 100 --output results.json
python evaluate_enron_emails.py --index data/enron_index_hnsw.leann --stage 4 --complexity 88 --max-queries 100 --output results.json
5) Generation evaluation (Stage 5)
python evaluate_enron_emails.py --index data/enron_index_hnsw.leann --stage 5 --complexity 88 --llm-backend hf --model-name Qwen/Qwen3-8B
6) Combined index + generation evaluation (Stages 4+5, recommended)
python evaluate_enron_emails.py --index data/enron_index_hnsw.leann --stage 45 --complexity 88 --llm-backend hf
Notes:
- Minimal CLI: you can run from repo root with only `--index`, defaults match financebench/laion patterns:
- `--stage` defaults to `all` (runs 2, 3, 4)
- `--stage` defaults to `all` (runs 2, 3, 4, 5)
- `--baseline-dir` defaults to `baseline`
- `--queries` defaults to `data/evaluation_queries.jsonl` (or falls back to the index directory)
- `--llm-backend` defaults to `hf` (HuggingFace), can use `vllm`
- `--model-name` defaults to `Qwen/Qwen3-8B`
- Fail-fast behavior: no silent fallbacks. If compact index cannot run with recompute, it errors out.
4) Index comparison (Stage 4)
python evaluate_enron_emails.py --index data/enron_index_hnsw.leann --stage 4 --max-queries 100 --output results.json
- Stage 5 requires Stage 4 retrieval results. Use `--stage 45` to run both efficiently.
Optional flags:
- --queries data/evaluation_queries.jsonl (custom queries file)
- --baseline-dir baseline (where FAISS baseline lives)
- --complexity 64 (LEANN complexity parameter)
- --complexity 88 (LEANN complexity parameter, optimal for 90% recall)
- --llm-backend hf|vllm (LLM backend for generation)
- --model-name Qwen/Qwen3-8B (LLM model for generation)
- --max-queries 1000 (limit number of queries for evaluation)
## Files Produced
- data/enron_passages_preview.jsonl: Small preview of passages used (for inspection)
@@ -66,8 +77,9 @@ Optional flags:
- data/evaluation_queries.jsonl: Query file (id + query; includes GT IDs for reference)
## Notes
- We only evaluate retrieval Recall@3 (no generation). This matches the other benches style and stage flow.
- Evaluates both retrieval Recall@3 and generation timing with Qwen3-8B thinking model.
- The emails CSV must contain a column named "message" (raw RFC822 email) and a column named "file" for source identifier. Message-ID headers are parsed as canonical message IDs when present.
- Qwen3-8B requires special handling for thinking models with chat templates and <think></think> tag processing.
## Stages Summary
@@ -80,16 +92,23 @@ Optional flags:
- Stage 4 (Index Comparison):
- Reports .index-only sizes for compact vs non-compact.
- Measures timings on 100 queries by default: non-compact (no recompute) vs compact (with recompute).
- Measures timings on queries by default: non-compact (no recompute) vs compact (with recompute).
- Stores retrieval results for Stage 5 generation evaluation.
- Fails fast if compact recompute cannot run.
- If `--complexity` is not provided, the script tries to use the best complexity from Stage 3:
- First from the current run (when running `--stage all`), otherwise
- From `enron_stage3_results.json` saved next to the index during the last Stage 3 run.
- If neither exists, Stage 4 will error and ask you to run Stage 3 or pass `--complexity`.
- Stage 5 (Generation Evaluation):
- Uses Qwen3-8B thinking model for RAG generation on retrieved documents from Stage 4.
- Supports HuggingFace (`hf`) and vLLM (`vllm`) backends.
- Measures generation timing separately from search timing.
- Requires Stage 4 results (no additional searching performed).
## Example Results
These are sample results obtained on a subset of Enron data using all-mpnet-base-v2.
These are sample results obtained on Enron data using all-mpnet-base-v2 and Qwen3-8B.
- Stage 3 (Binary Search):
- Minimal complexity achieving 90% Recall@3: 88
@@ -103,14 +122,20 @@ These are sample results obtained on a subset of Enron data using all-mpnet-base
- C=256 → 92.0% Recall@3
- Stage 4 (Index Sizes, .index only):
- Compact: ~2.17 MB
- Non-compact: ~82.03 MB
- Storage saving by compact: ~97.35%
- Compact: ~2.2 MB
- Non-compact: ~82.0 MB
- Storage saving by compact: ~97.3%
- Stage 4 (Timing, 100 queries, complexity=88):
- Non-compact (no recompute): ~0.0074 s avg per query
- Compact (with recompute): ~1.947 s avg per query
- Stage 4 (Search Timing, 988 queries, complexity=88):
- Non-compact (no recompute): ~0.0075 s avg per query
- Compact (with recompute): ~1.981 s avg per query
- Speed ratio (non-compact/compact): ~0.0038x
Full JSON output for Stage 4 is saved by the script (see `--output`), e.g.:
`benchmarks/enron_emails/results_enron_stage4.json`.
- Stage 5 (RAG Generation, 988 queries, Qwen3-8B):
- Average generation time: ~22.302 s per query
- Total queries processed: 988
- LLM backend: HuggingFace transformers
- Model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B (thinking model with <think></think> processing)
Full JSON output is saved by the script (see `--output`), e.g.:
`benchmarks/enron_emails/results_enron_stage45.json`.

View File

@@ -7,13 +7,22 @@ On errors, fail fast without fallbacks.
import argparse
import json
import logging
import os
import pickle
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
from leann import LeannBuilder, LeannSearcher
from leann_backend_hnsw import faiss
from ..llm_utils import generate_hf, generate_vllm, load_hf_model, load_vllm_model
# Setup logging to reduce verbose output
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.WARNING)
logging.getLogger("leann.api").setLevel(logging.WARNING)
logging.getLogger("leann_backend_hnsw").setLevel(logging.WARNING)
class RecallEvaluator:
"""Stage 2: Evaluate Recall@3 (LEANN vs FAISS)"""
@@ -119,7 +128,6 @@ class EnronEvaluator:
def analyze_index_sizes(self) -> dict:
"""Analyze index sizes (.index only), similar to LAION bench."""
from pathlib import Path
print("📏 Analyzing index sizes (.index only)...")
index_path = Path(self.index_path)
@@ -150,7 +158,6 @@ class EnronEvaluator:
def create_non_compact_index_for_comparison(self, non_compact_index_path: str) -> dict:
"""Create a non-compact index for comparison using current passages and embeddings."""
from pathlib import Path
current_index_path = Path(self.index_path)
current_index_dir = current_index_path.parent
@@ -230,6 +237,7 @@ class EnronEvaluator:
"compact": {"search_times": []},
"avg_search_times": {},
"speed_ratio": 0.0,
"retrieval_results": [], # Store retrieval results for Stage 5
}
print("⚡ Comparing search performance between indexes...")
@@ -248,10 +256,15 @@ class EnronEvaluator:
compact_searcher = LeannSearcher(compact_path)
for q in test_queries:
t0 = time.time()
_ = compact_searcher.search(
docs = compact_searcher.search(
q, top_k=3, complexity=complexity, recompute_embeddings=True
)
results["compact"]["search_times"].append(time.time() - t0)
# Store retrieval results for Stage 5
results["retrieval_results"].append(
{"query": q, "retrieved_docs": [{"id": doc.id, "text": doc.text} for doc in docs]}
)
compact_searcher.cleanup()
if results["non_compact"]["search_times"]:
@@ -358,9 +371,9 @@ def main():
)
parser.add_argument(
"--stage",
choices=["2", "3", "4", "all"],
choices=["2", "3", "4", "5", "all", "45"],
default="all",
help="Which stage to run (2=recall, 3=complexity, 4=index comparison)",
help="Which stage to run (2=recall, 3=complexity, 4=index comparison, 5=generation)",
)
parser.add_argument("--complexity", type=int, default=None, help="LEANN search complexity")
parser.add_argument("--baseline-dir", default="baseline", help="Baseline output directory")
@@ -371,6 +384,8 @@ def main():
"--target-recall", type=float, default=0.90, help="Target Recall@3 for Stage 3"
)
parser.add_argument("--output", help="Save results to JSON file")
parser.add_argument("--llm-backend", choices=["hf", "vllm"], default="hf", help="LLM backend")
parser.add_argument("--model-name", default="Qwen/Qwen3-8B", help="Model name")
args = parser.parse_args()
@@ -438,7 +453,7 @@ def main():
enron_eval.cleanup()
print("✅ Stage 3 completed!\n")
if args.stage in ("4", "all"):
if args.stage in ("4", "all", "45"):
print("🚀 Starting Stage 4: Index size + performance comparison")
evaluator = RecallEvaluator(args.index, args.baseline_dir)
enron_eval = EnronEvaluator(args.index)
@@ -503,6 +518,92 @@ def main():
enron_eval.cleanup()
print("✅ Stage 4 completed!\n")
if args.stage in ("5", "all"):
print("🚀 Starting Stage 5: Generation evaluation with Qwen3-8B")
# Check if Stage 4 results exist
if "stage4" not in results_out or "performance_comparison" not in results_out["stage4"]:
print("❌ Stage 5 requires Stage 4 retrieval results")
print("💡 Run Stage 4 first or use --stage all")
raise SystemExit(1)
retrieval_results = results_out["stage4"]["performance_comparison"]["retrieval_results"]
if not retrieval_results:
print("❌ No retrieval results found from Stage 4")
raise SystemExit(1)
print(f"📁 Using {len(retrieval_results)} retrieval results from Stage 4")
# Load LLM
try:
if args.llm_backend == "hf":
tokenizer, model = load_hf_model(args.model_name)
def llm_func(prompt):
return generate_hf(tokenizer, model, prompt)
else: # vllm
llm, sampling_params = load_vllm_model(args.model_name)
def llm_func(prompt):
return generate_vllm(llm, sampling_params, prompt)
# Run generation using stored retrieval results
import time
from llm_utils import create_prompt
generation_times = []
responses = []
print("🤖 Running generation on pre-retrieved results...")
for i, item in enumerate(retrieval_results):
query = item["query"]
retrieved_docs = item["retrieved_docs"]
# Prepare context from retrieved docs
context = "\n\n".join([doc["text"] for doc in retrieved_docs])
prompt = create_prompt(context, query, "emails")
# Time generation only
gen_start = time.time()
response = llm_func(prompt)
gen_time = time.time() - gen_start
generation_times.append(gen_time)
responses.append(response)
if i < 3:
print(f" Q{i + 1}: Gen={gen_time:.3f}s")
avg_gen_time = sum(generation_times) / len(generation_times)
print("\n📊 Generation Results:")
print(f" Total Queries: {len(retrieval_results)}")
print(f" Avg Generation Time: {avg_gen_time:.3f}s")
print(" (Search time from Stage 4)")
results_out["stage5"] = {
"total_queries": len(retrieval_results),
"avg_generation_time": avg_gen_time,
"generation_times": generation_times,
"responses": responses,
}
# Show sample results
print("\n📝 Sample Results:")
for i in range(min(3, len(retrieval_results))):
query = retrieval_results[i]["query"]
response = responses[i]
print(f" Q{i + 1}: {query[:60]}...")
print(f" A{i + 1}: {response[:100]}...")
print()
except Exception as e:
print(f"❌ Generation evaluation failed: {e}")
print("💡 Make sure transformers/vllm is installed and model is available")
print("✅ Stage 5 completed!\n")
if args.output and results_out:
with open(args.output, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
json.dump(results_out, f, indent=2)