docs: highlight diskann readiness and add performance comparison
This commit is contained in:
@@ -524,12 +524,16 @@ Options:
|
||||
- **Dynamic batching:** Efficiently batch embedding computations for GPU utilization
|
||||
- **Two-level search:** Smart graph traversal that prioritizes promising nodes
|
||||
|
||||
**Backends:** HNSW (default) for most use cases, with optional DiskANN support for billion-scale datasets.
|
||||
**Backends:**
|
||||
- **HNSW** (default): Ideal for most datasets with maximum storage savings through full recomputation
|
||||
- **DiskANN**: Advanced option with superior search performance, using PQ-based graph traversal with real-time reranking for the best speed-accuracy trade-off
|
||||
|
||||
## Benchmarks
|
||||
|
||||
**[DiskANN vs HNSW Performance Comparison →](benchmarks/diskann_vs_hnsw_speed_comparison.py)** - Compare search performance between both backends
|
||||
|
||||
**[Simple Example: Compare LEANN vs FAISS →](benchmarks/compare_faiss_vs_leann.py)** - See storage savings in action
|
||||
|
||||
**[Simple Example: Compare LEANN vs FAISS →](benchmarks/compare_faiss_vs_leann.py)**
|
||||
### 📊 Storage Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
| System | DPR (2.1M) | Wiki (60M) | Chat (400K) | Email (780K) | Browser (38K) |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user