feat: finance bench
This commit is contained in:
84
benchmarks/financebench/README.md
Normal file
84
benchmarks/financebench/README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# FinanceBench Benchmark for LEANN-RAG
|
||||
|
||||
FinanceBench is a benchmark for evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems on financial document question-answering tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dataset
|
||||
|
||||
- **Source**: [PatronusAI/financebench](https://huggingface.co/datasets/PatronusAI/financebench)
|
||||
- **Questions**: 150 financial Q&A examples
|
||||
- **Documents**: 368 PDF files (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, earnings reports)
|
||||
- **Companies**: Major public companies (3M, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, etc.)
|
||||
- **Paper**: [FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answering](https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11944)
|
||||
|
||||
## Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
benchmarks/financebench/
|
||||
├── setup_financebench.py # Downloads PDFs and builds index
|
||||
├── evaluate_financebench.py # Intelligent evaluation script
|
||||
├── data/
|
||||
│ ├── financebench_merged.jsonl # Q&A dataset
|
||||
│ ├── pdfs/ # Downloaded financial documents
|
||||
│ └── index/ # LEANN indexes
|
||||
│ └── financebench_full_hnsw.leann
|
||||
└── README.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Setup (Download & Build Index)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cd benchmarks/financebench
|
||||
python setup_financebench.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This will:
|
||||
- Download the 150 Q&A examples
|
||||
- Download all 368 PDF documents (parallel processing)
|
||||
- Build a LEANN index from 53K+ text chunks
|
||||
- Verify setup with test query
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Evaluation
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Basic retrieval evaluation
|
||||
python evaluate_financebench.py --index data/index/financebench_full_hnsw.leann
|
||||
|
||||
# Include QA evaluation with OpenAI
|
||||
export OPENAI_API_KEY="your-key"
|
||||
python evaluate_financebench.py --index data/index/financebench_full_hnsw.leann --qa-samples 20
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Evaluation Methods
|
||||
|
||||
### Retrieval Evaluation
|
||||
Uses intelligent matching with three strategies:
|
||||
1. **Exact text overlap** - Direct substring matches
|
||||
2. **Number matching** - Key financial figures ($1,577, 1.2B, etc.)
|
||||
3. **Semantic similarity** - Word overlap with 20% threshold
|
||||
|
||||
### QA Evaluation
|
||||
LLM-based answer evaluation using GPT-4o:
|
||||
- Handles numerical rounding and equivalent representations
|
||||
- Considers fractions, percentages, and decimal equivalents
|
||||
- Evaluates semantic meaning rather than exact text match
|
||||
|
||||
## Expected Results
|
||||
|
||||
Previous runs show:
|
||||
- **Question Coverage**: ~65-75% (questions with relevant docs retrieved)
|
||||
- **Index Size**: 53,985 chunks from 368 PDFs
|
||||
- **Search Time**: ~0.1-0.2s per query
|
||||
- **Build Time**: ~5-10 minutes with sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2
|
||||
|
||||
## Options
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Use different backends
|
||||
python setup_financebench.py --backend diskann
|
||||
python evaluate_financebench.py --index data/index/financebench_full_diskann.leann
|
||||
|
||||
# Use different embedding models
|
||||
python setup_financebench.py --embedding-model facebook/contriever
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user